🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts about the comments delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz in the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, he invoked the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). He stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three competitors in the world in succession. He is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class delivery and powerful power on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the alarming speed and fluidity of much shorter players. He is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected advancements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing drought of American men winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

The American star achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the run to the point of frustration. When he eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use excessive energy to win it. Facing set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially seem like he believed he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding almost everyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only express how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {